Julius Caesar was a commander and a
politician in ancient Rome. When he was young, he thought he might be a
playwright. He was a theatrical person.
However, when he held the actual power of
Rome, he made an anti-theatrical decision. He banned actors from running in the
election.
Now, it is difficult to us to understand why
he did that.
In the modern world that we live in,
theatrical actors are artists or strange people who live in an almost
non-profitable world.
But please try to picture the ancient world,
without any Internet, TVs, movies, or radios. The literacy rate was very low.
And there was no technology for publications. From that perspective, theater
could be the most powerful “media.” We can’t even imagine how strong an
influence it had.
Theatrical actors were popular people in the
“media.” Julius Caesar banned the popular people in the “media” from running in
the election and becoming political leaders. It is possible that he decided
this because he was a theatrical person.
Of course, in our society, no one is banned
from running in elections because of their occupation. In modern history, we
can find many politicians who are popular people in various forms of media,
whether the popularity is good or bad.
Or, maybe we are being challenged by the
ancient hero.
Should popular people in media be political
leaders?
Was Julius Caesar right? Or are we right?
Photo by UMC
No comments:
Post a Comment